 |
 |
I think a global list of sources would be easier to maintain and document.
Is NTTCOM no longer trusted?
I took a look at the AS11232 customer cone and there are a few objects in NTTCOM but it looked as though all of them also appear in another database so I don’t have strong feelings that NTTCOM needs to be included.
 |
Miles McCredie
Office: 6052755192 Midco.com |
From: MICE Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
On Behalf Of Richard Laager
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:58 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] IRR Mandatory at MICE / New Route Servers
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of
MIDCO.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
On 2023-05-09 14:01, August Yang wrote:
Should I reorder RADB,ARIN to be ARIN,RADB?
Definitely. We have objects registered in all databases feasible to prevent AS-SET squatting, which has occurred in the past, while only RADB has the actual members listed. Turns out correct prefix list can be generated using bgpq4 regardless of the order, so it's better to prioritize authenticated sources.
In thinking about this some more... Is IXP Manager's behavior of per-participant IRR sources actually useful? In other words, what's wrong with just setting everyone to: ARIN,RIPE,LACNIC,APNIC,AFRINIC,RADB,LEVEL3?
--
Richard
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1