What's the need for a remote switch in the same building as the Core Switches? Are they running out of ports
Gary Glissendorf | Network Architect
[log in to unmask] | 2900 W 10th St. | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 USA
Direct +1.605.978.3558 | Mobile +1.605.359.3737 | TF +1.800.247.1442 | Fax +1.605.334.4782
“Be Excellent to Each Other”
-----Original Message-----
From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Richard Laager
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 10:44 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] MN VoIP Remote Switch Request
The board has received a request for a new remote switch. In accordance with our procedures, I'm bringing this to the community for discussion.
After this, the board will vote on the proposal.
The switch would be operated by MN VoIP. It would be located in Cologix's suite 100 in the 511 Building.
Jeremy Lumby wrote:
> I would promise to notify any members connecting to the switch that
> they are not on the main switch, upgrade my link to the main MICE
> switch if the traffic goes above 66% and impose MAC, and BDPU limits
> on all member facing ports connecting to the remote switch. To get
> started I would upgrade to a 10G single port LAG
The switch may not be dedicated to MICE. As such, the MICE technical committee may not have configuration access to the switch. SNMP access (for graphing individual ports) also may not be available, depending on build out.
--
Richard
________________________________
***This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use or distribution of the information included in this message is prohibited -- Please immediately and permanently delete.***
|