LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for MICE-DISCUSS Archives


MICE-DISCUSS Archives

MICE-DISCUSS Archives


MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MICE-DISCUSS Home

MICE-DISCUSS Home

MICE-DISCUSS  February 2018

MICE-DISCUSS February 2018

Subject:

Re: Arista Support Contract

From:

"DeLong, Owen" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

MICE Discuss <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 5 Feb 2018 17:08:17 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (90 lines)

 
> On Feb 2, 2018, at 14:25 , Richard Laager <[log in to unmask]> wrote: 
>  
> On 02/02/2018 09:20 AM, DeLong, Owen wrote: 
>> However, disclosure to the membership is not disclosure to the public. It is 
>> disclosure to the “owners” of the business 
>  
> The members are absolutely the owners of MICE. 
>  
> In general, I think that disclosure to the member-owners is 
> substantially similar to disclosure to the public, as the member-owners 
> are not held to any binding NDA. 
 
While that’s currently true, it certainly doesn’t need to remain true. Heck, if you’re that 
concerned about it, you could even ask members that want to know the details to sign an event 
specific NDA, or, you could ask members that want additional information available to sign a 
generic NDA. We could create a second mailing list which only contains members who signed if 
that’s an issue. 
 
>  
>> who by the very nature of this discussion> are obviously decision makers in the process. 
>  
> This thread is an opportunity for the members to provide input to the 
> board. The board is the decision maker. 
 
This is hair splitting and the point is that we’re being asked to provide input/contribute 
to the decision without complete information. 
 
>> It is pretty normal to disclose quote details to the decision makers. 
>  
> Agreed. As I noted, the board is fully informed of the pricing. 
 
The board is the duly elected representatives of the owners who are the ultimate decision makers in this context. 
There are many ways we can split hairs here, but this won’t likely be the only time we face a similar situation in 
the future of MICE. 
 
>> Is there a MICE-MEMBERS list that isn’t open to the public? 
>  
> No. We can certainly discuss that separately. 
 
Sure. I’d say it’s probably a good idea. 
 
>> certainly disclosure 
>> to individual members that request the data (consider this such a request from Akamai) 
>> is entirely appropriate. 
> The authority of the owners is as a collective, not individually. An 
> individual member-owner of a coop can request anything they want, but 
> that does not obligate the coop to provide that information. Buying a 
> telephone line from a mutual telephone company makes you a member-owner, 
> but does not give a member-owner the authority to compel production of 
> the details of pricing on their telephone switch support contract. Nor 
> does buying electricity from an electric coop give a member-owner the 
> authority to unilaterally compel release of business records relating to 
> energy purchase agreements, even though such details are absolutely 
> critical to the long-term financial viability of the business. 
 
Fair enough. Should we hold a vote of the membership on whether the pricing information 
should be provided to the members as part of this process. 
 
> This is not limited to coops, either. If I purchase a share of Cisco, 
> Akamai, or any other publicly traded company, that makes me an owner, 
> but I cannot individually compel the company to provide me confidential 
> business records. 
 
It depends on how many shares you purchase. IIRC, the standard is something 
like 1% before you are able to compel an agenda item on the AGM, for example. 
 
> I think that MICE as a business has a legitimate need for non-disclosure 
> of certain details. For example, if the owners require that pricing 
> details on our purchases is made public, it is reasonable to fear that 
> vendors may give MICE smaller discounts. For another example, if the 
> owners require that port traffic numbers are made public, we may lose 
> members (e.g. Akamai) who wish their port traffic numbers to be 
> confidential, even from the other member-owners. 
 
Sure, there are always tradeoffs. However, note that I’m not asking that the 
pricing details be made public. I expressed a willingness to sign an appropriate 
NDA and general agreement not to further disclose the information. As such, I 
do not agree that what is being requested is general disclosure to the public. 
 
> This isn't to say that the board or management can do whatever they want 
> and keep the owners in the dark. Obviously, the company's management and 
> board need to provide various reports on the company's activities. 
 
I think we’re mostly on the same page. I didn’t expect this to be such a 
contentious matter. 
 
Owen 
 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager