[Doug]
> But still, many things break in NAT still without special
> provisions (ie. SIP, H.323, etc. etc) that they aren't going to
> allow in a carrier-wide NAT setup.
So it might end up as a two-tier thing, with most people behind NAT
and some people paying more for a routable address.
> We'll have to see what kind of routing is like, or if we only have
> people on the coasts to talk to anyway.
I'd be interested to know what it looks like.
> Colo and the like is pretty straight forward for IPv6 setup. DSL,
> not so much.
So it's possible to get IPV6 packets anywhere but to the end user
<half wink>.
Regards,
Matt
|