LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for TECH-DISCUSS Archives


TECH-DISCUSS Archives

TECH-DISCUSS Archives


TECH-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TECH-DISCUSS Home

TECH-DISCUSS Home

TECH-DISCUSS  March 2010

TECH-DISCUSS March 2010

Subject:

Re: IPV6?

From:

Matthew Dixon Cowles <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Technical Discussions List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:37:37 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (21 lines)

[Doug]
> But still, many things break in NAT still without special
> provisions (ie. SIP, H.323, etc. etc) that they aren't going to
> allow in a carrier-wide NAT setup.

So it might end up as a two-tier thing, with most people behind NAT
and some people paying more for a routable address.

> We'll have to see what kind of routing is like, or if we only have
> people on the coasts to talk to anyway.

I'd be interested to know what it looks like.

> Colo and the like is pretty straight forward for IPv6 setup. DSL,
> not so much.

So it's possible to get IPV6 packets anywhere but to the end user
<half wink>.

Regards,
Matt

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2011
May 2011
November 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager