> -----Original Message-----
> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> merlyn
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 12:59
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] IP address changes
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:41:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote:
> > I vaguely remember someone from the iphouse mentioning that they were
> going to add secondary IP addresses to the route servers during the
> outage. Just wondering if this has happened since I can only ping them on
> their original addresses.
>
> That was Mike who is out of town this week, and the schedule of the
> changeover took he and I unprepared as well.
>
> There, I've gone ahead and did the IPv4 entries to be 206.108.255.1 &
> 206.108.255.2 since the general consensys is to keep the same IPv4 last
> octet.
>
> Nobody should be announcing prefixes with the next hop of
> 206.108.255.x yet though.
>

Was there consensus on v6 addressing scheme? 2001:504:27::/48 was the assigned block. Are we keeping the same last hextet here as well?

Andy

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1