Ill take a look in the queue.
Thanks
> On May 9, 2016, at 21:09, Andrew Hoyos <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Likewise here, crickets……
>
>
>> On May 9, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Jeremy Lumby <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone heard back from [log in to unmask] ? It has been almost 2 weeks, my bi-lateral peering request has gone unanswered, and the session I built for them is not established. I know Marty mentioned they were working on some things, however I have not even gotten a reply acknowledging my emails.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hannigan, Martin
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 9:34 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Update for Akamai (AS 20940) < > MICE
>>
>>
>> Greetings everyone. And Reid. :-)
>>
>> Our implementation is proceeding and we’re projecting that we’ll be moving bits back to the exchange in the next few weeks.
>>
>> Unfortunately, we’re dropping our route server sessions permanently. Everyone who is now route server only will need to established bi lateral peering. Send your peering request to [log in to unmask] with the requisite details (ASN, peer addresses). If you had a direct session previously, we have not forgotten it and there’s no need to restate. Traffic will return slowly, first with our SSL bits and then full on edge a few weeks after that.
>>
>> Thanks for your patience and for helping to build a better Internet in MSP.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Martin Hannigan // AS 20940 // AS 32787
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
|